Posts
The development of world music in the 2000 mid-decade ago, colored by news many bands that never received his glory in his day, would do a reunion, a reunion tour just good or even better than it was a reunion to work on new work. Big bands such as Led Zeppelin, The Police, Genesis, Queen, Deep Purple, Fleetwood Mac, Guns' N Roses, Van Halen, Pink Floyd and many more waiting in line to entertain the fans.
Unfortunately, not all of them to reap success, like some bands who just held a reunion for big names, even leaving personnel become icons in the band, meanwhile, rumors have spread that among them would do such a reconciliation, but in the end it was never occurred.
Although the list of bands that will perform the longer the reunion does not mean that the more successful bands to repeat his glory. Although, some of them still managed to does a reunion tour just to greet fans?
If a few years back has become a successful reunion phenomenon evidence of a band, it was only because the 'divisions' that occurs is not something permanent. Band split by bitter experience, background hate each other, like Dinosaur Jr.., The Police, Pixies, or Guns N 'Roses, to look back at their past that is filled with blasphemy against each other each other, just for a term' nostalgia '. The music lovers, critics, and most of us even, to see this phenomenon as an attempt to regain financial coffers are least able to help them overcome economic problems. There is nothing wrong, they work, and they deserve what they should get.
However, the high prestige because disappeared from circulation for a long time, from the band who still survived, such as Queen, INXS, and The Doors 21st century Riders On The Storm, which all started trying to repeat the triumph after one of the dead band icon . Although not difficult to free from the myth that 'icon is not replaceable', for the sake of profits, seems it not say a bad idea.
Many bands take the risk of their reputations back by starting a new chapter in their musical journey. There's even some band Pixies record opposing the new album for various reasons. But they still held a tour; steps should be taken after the new album was made. News The Pixies reunion was one of the big news in 2004, after several tours with the same Setlist, more or less the same venue the size also, it seems they just need time together, and appeared at live TV show, but the results were not as expected.
At that time, many more eyes were on the news of the reunion will be held The Police, early 2007, the first month's concert schedule is very crowded, but very disappointing the fans because they expect something more spontaneity of the band is their idol. Maybe some of us also wondered motivation they held a reunion, as we know, Sting and Stewart Copeland hating each other with each other, and must remove all to re-explore grudge glory they once experienced a dozen years ago. Maybe they also want to channel the desire to make music together again in a reunion tour, as well as treating misses the fans.
Reunited for a new album is another matter. Since this requires matching each other, chemistry, in the creative process. Sometimes a dispute or a match between two musicians that might none of them can create when they work alone. And even a Paul Westerberg better if he was forced to work with many limitations, such as the lack of talented musicians as a partner, a little more to explain why The Replacements was better with guitarist Bob Stinson is playing while running on the stage, rather than a pro guitarist Slim Dunlap who had never played all the wrong tone.
However, the most important thing in a reunion was when the long dispute began to fade, they pay for it with something new. For example, many people like the album 2 New Order before the last dispute between Bernard Sumner and Peter Hook, but the album does not sound like the work of New Order, they sound like a Britpop band in the category of pretty, but carried the name New Order. So what's the point having a reunion?
You may argue here, that a reunion tour or a reunion album is not a bad idea. But indeed, there is also a successful increase their catalog lists like Mission Of Burma, to produce two decent reunion album alongside their old catalog of twenty years after the vacuum. Even Dinosaur Jr.album. Beyond, is the work of their follow-up a solid, more phenomenal than when they were still frontman J Mascis while still bears the name Dinosaur 90s era.
Or would be very nice if Pavement doing a tour again, or The Smiths. Since both of their frontman Morrissey and Johnny Marr were in 'harmony'. However, Morrissey was too old to be in its own since the 80s, while Marr has never created the Smiths Riffs caliber since he left the band to be raised and Modest Mouse frontman, maybe even no longer desire to write for the Smiths. In addition, Morrissey and Marr was not too appreciative and underestimate the contribution of the Smiths rhythm section, and it was the Smiths reunion without Mike Joyce is also suing former colleagues a few years ago and Andy Rourke practically a sad reunion.
Anyway, who is also an important issue emerges here is how the music industry forces us to think first about the 'band' was originally like. This is just a marketing strategy. When the tour Journey without Steve Perry (yes, Steve Perry was not the founder of Journey, but he sings the hits "Do not Stop Believin '.") Or Styx without Dennis De Young, or even Van Halen without David Lee Roth, they simply draw attention fans with big names, not with his music.
Another example, when Billy Corgan and Jimmy Chamberlin Smashing Pumpkins brought back in 2006 without James Iha and D'arcy Wretzky, instead took other musicians, namely guitarist Jeff Schroeder and bassist Ginger Reyes and kibordis Lisa Harriton. Then, The Who, John Entwistle's death even the day before held a reunion tour, not to mention since abandoned by Keith Moon, Roger Daltrey did not stop and Pete Townsend went on the plan. While not denying this reunion probably will reap success because they do have a trading value, with their musicality, such as Jeff Lynne was called back to his old friend Lou Barlow or Richard Tandy to make a reunion album with the same concepts as their old catalog. At the time expressed Electric Light Orchestra disbanded in the 80s era, they are still trying to carry a contemporary art rock, though laced with new nuances. When Lynne and Tandy brought back with the album ELO Zoom in 2001, sounded like Lynne has just created a number of classic works of ELO.
Daltrey and Townsend It was not trying to create 'The Who's songs', because they have not been more frequently collaborate and do things separately, and had no intention to repeat the success of their classics while working on a new album, like they did with Endless Wire album, which is not too bad but not like The Who. Then why are they still carry the name of The Who, why not Daltrey / Townsend as the Page / Plant in 1994.
Because some names sell, and some do not.
Maybe some of the protest to the REM fans, who still considers himself REM, after Bill Berry left the band in 1997 due to health conditions, whereas the other three highly collaborative with each other. Even if they retain their identity under the name of REM properly should be supported, as did Berry when asked to continue carrying the three big names.
Although the last two albums R.E.M. caliber no early works them, it seems we still hope they still have a sense as a band. They do not have headache thinking about whether the work created will reflect the music REM or not. If Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, Mike Mills and Bill Berry back together and working, then the resulting work is a direct reflection of the musicality of each personnel REM
For some reason, many bands played 'vacuum for an unlimited time' after the rock era faded mid 90s. One is Sleater-Kinney, the American rock band that was founded in 1994 through 2006, according to Carrie Brownstein in an interview, stated that they were not completely dissolved, they are still there, like Fugazi, vacuum, and then came the next year to hold tour. They did not declare disbanded, only 'vacuum'.
When a musician predicated as a solo artist, and is famous for its predicate, then lifted again with formation of a band that he wanted without changing the name of the band, it was also another case. But when a few musicians (who had been in a band) and re-assemble and form a band with the name 'The Whatevers' for instance, is like they were 'fake' a pact. Because, they will try their initial configuration together as closely as possible. Naturally if they keep fighting for what they've done before, but still upholds the name 'The Whatevers' earlier. It's like doing two big jobs at once.
Sometimes, nostalgia's not worth it.
When a band together just to the memory of past glory, having fun with what they produce, indulged his fans with a variety of concerts, the reunion can be a success. Only once record in a while, and in small scale. On the other hand, if a band trying to regain old glory has vanished in a new collaboration, then we will see is just an attempt to repeat the past, which I think one way to avoid assumptions 'lack of creativity '.
You'll also find they are not getting what they should get, when they only sell the name, and do not sell their work. That's what happened to a band that lost icon.
And then there are some rare moment, a lot of bands who reunited for the past attraction they still felt strong. Tour Jimmy Page and Robert Plant with the album No Quarter: Unledded is one example that can be practically managed. They are two great musicians who still have charisma and decent work aligned with the glory, Led Zeppelin.
No Led Zeppelin Reunion, just Page and Plant. Good stuff. Period.
Unfortunately, not all of them to reap success, like some bands who just held a reunion for big names, even leaving personnel become icons in the band, meanwhile, rumors have spread that among them would do such a reconciliation, but in the end it was never occurred.
Although the list of bands that will perform the longer the reunion does not mean that the more successful bands to repeat his glory. Although, some of them still managed to does a reunion tour just to greet fans?
If a few years back has become a successful reunion phenomenon evidence of a band, it was only because the 'divisions' that occurs is not something permanent. Band split by bitter experience, background hate each other, like Dinosaur Jr.., The Police, Pixies, or Guns N 'Roses, to look back at their past that is filled with blasphemy against each other each other, just for a term' nostalgia '. The music lovers, critics, and most of us even, to see this phenomenon as an attempt to regain financial coffers are least able to help them overcome economic problems. There is nothing wrong, they work, and they deserve what they should get.
However, the high prestige because disappeared from circulation for a long time, from the band who still survived, such as Queen, INXS, and The Doors 21st century Riders On The Storm, which all started trying to repeat the triumph after one of the dead band icon . Although not difficult to free from the myth that 'icon is not replaceable', for the sake of profits, seems it not say a bad idea.
Many bands take the risk of their reputations back by starting a new chapter in their musical journey. There's even some band Pixies record opposing the new album for various reasons. But they still held a tour; steps should be taken after the new album was made. News The Pixies reunion was one of the big news in 2004, after several tours with the same Setlist, more or less the same venue the size also, it seems they just need time together, and appeared at live TV show, but the results were not as expected.
At that time, many more eyes were on the news of the reunion will be held The Police, early 2007, the first month's concert schedule is very crowded, but very disappointing the fans because they expect something more spontaneity of the band is their idol. Maybe some of us also wondered motivation they held a reunion, as we know, Sting and Stewart Copeland hating each other with each other, and must remove all to re-explore grudge glory they once experienced a dozen years ago. Maybe they also want to channel the desire to make music together again in a reunion tour, as well as treating misses the fans.
Reunited for a new album is another matter. Since this requires matching each other, chemistry, in the creative process. Sometimes a dispute or a match between two musicians that might none of them can create when they work alone. And even a Paul Westerberg better if he was forced to work with many limitations, such as the lack of talented musicians as a partner, a little more to explain why The Replacements was better with guitarist Bob Stinson is playing while running on the stage, rather than a pro guitarist Slim Dunlap who had never played all the wrong tone.
However, the most important thing in a reunion was when the long dispute began to fade, they pay for it with something new. For example, many people like the album 2 New Order before the last dispute between Bernard Sumner and Peter Hook, but the album does not sound like the work of New Order, they sound like a Britpop band in the category of pretty, but carried the name New Order. So what's the point having a reunion?
You may argue here, that a reunion tour or a reunion album is not a bad idea. But indeed, there is also a successful increase their catalog lists like Mission Of Burma, to produce two decent reunion album alongside their old catalog of twenty years after the vacuum. Even Dinosaur Jr.album. Beyond, is the work of their follow-up a solid, more phenomenal than when they were still frontman J Mascis while still bears the name Dinosaur 90s era.
Or would be very nice if Pavement doing a tour again, or The Smiths. Since both of their frontman Morrissey and Johnny Marr were in 'harmony'. However, Morrissey was too old to be in its own since the 80s, while Marr has never created the Smiths Riffs caliber since he left the band to be raised and Modest Mouse frontman, maybe even no longer desire to write for the Smiths. In addition, Morrissey and Marr was not too appreciative and underestimate the contribution of the Smiths rhythm section, and it was the Smiths reunion without Mike Joyce is also suing former colleagues a few years ago and Andy Rourke practically a sad reunion.
Anyway, who is also an important issue emerges here is how the music industry forces us to think first about the 'band' was originally like. This is just a marketing strategy. When the tour Journey without Steve Perry (yes, Steve Perry was not the founder of Journey, but he sings the hits "Do not Stop Believin '.") Or Styx without Dennis De Young, or even Van Halen without David Lee Roth, they simply draw attention fans with big names, not with his music.
Another example, when Billy Corgan and Jimmy Chamberlin Smashing Pumpkins brought back in 2006 without James Iha and D'arcy Wretzky, instead took other musicians, namely guitarist Jeff Schroeder and bassist Ginger Reyes and kibordis Lisa Harriton. Then, The Who, John Entwistle's death even the day before held a reunion tour, not to mention since abandoned by Keith Moon, Roger Daltrey did not stop and Pete Townsend went on the plan. While not denying this reunion probably will reap success because they do have a trading value, with their musicality, such as Jeff Lynne was called back to his old friend Lou Barlow or Richard Tandy to make a reunion album with the same concepts as their old catalog. At the time expressed Electric Light Orchestra disbanded in the 80s era, they are still trying to carry a contemporary art rock, though laced with new nuances. When Lynne and Tandy brought back with the album ELO Zoom in 2001, sounded like Lynne has just created a number of classic works of ELO.
Daltrey and Townsend It was not trying to create 'The Who's songs', because they have not been more frequently collaborate and do things separately, and had no intention to repeat the success of their classics while working on a new album, like they did with Endless Wire album, which is not too bad but not like The Who. Then why are they still carry the name of The Who, why not Daltrey / Townsend as the Page / Plant in 1994.
Because some names sell, and some do not.
Maybe some of the protest to the REM fans, who still considers himself REM, after Bill Berry left the band in 1997 due to health conditions, whereas the other three highly collaborative with each other. Even if they retain their identity under the name of REM properly should be supported, as did Berry when asked to continue carrying the three big names.
Although the last two albums R.E.M. caliber no early works them, it seems we still hope they still have a sense as a band. They do not have headache thinking about whether the work created will reflect the music REM or not. If Michael Stipe, Peter Buck, Mike Mills and Bill Berry back together and working, then the resulting work is a direct reflection of the musicality of each personnel REM
For some reason, many bands played 'vacuum for an unlimited time' after the rock era faded mid 90s. One is Sleater-Kinney, the American rock band that was founded in 1994 through 2006, according to Carrie Brownstein in an interview, stated that they were not completely dissolved, they are still there, like Fugazi, vacuum, and then came the next year to hold tour. They did not declare disbanded, only 'vacuum'.
When a musician predicated as a solo artist, and is famous for its predicate, then lifted again with formation of a band that he wanted without changing the name of the band, it was also another case. But when a few musicians (who had been in a band) and re-assemble and form a band with the name 'The Whatevers' for instance, is like they were 'fake' a pact. Because, they will try their initial configuration together as closely as possible. Naturally if they keep fighting for what they've done before, but still upholds the name 'The Whatevers' earlier. It's like doing two big jobs at once.
Sometimes, nostalgia's not worth it.
When a band together just to the memory of past glory, having fun with what they produce, indulged his fans with a variety of concerts, the reunion can be a success. Only once record in a while, and in small scale. On the other hand, if a band trying to regain old glory has vanished in a new collaboration, then we will see is just an attempt to repeat the past, which I think one way to avoid assumptions 'lack of creativity '.
You'll also find they are not getting what they should get, when they only sell the name, and do not sell their work. That's what happened to a band that lost icon.
And then there are some rare moment, a lot of bands who reunited for the past attraction they still felt strong. Tour Jimmy Page and Robert Plant with the album No Quarter: Unledded is one example that can be practically managed. They are two great musicians who still have charisma and decent work aligned with the glory, Led Zeppelin.
No Led Zeppelin Reunion, just Page and Plant. Good stuff. Period.
0 comments:
Post a Comment